On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 7:10 AM, <tobias.herk...@optivo.de> wrote: > The ORT session requirement or > question never wanted to solve this completely different issue at all. > > Every other solution that came up in this discussion, run down to > possible pathes: > > 1# much more complex idea, that tries to solve a lot more than the > initial question asked for... > > 2# leaving the situation like it is right now without changing anything >
These statements are complete non sequiturs in the discussion. M3AAWG Open Roundtable topics are (almost by definition) poorly formed, nascent ideas that need to be refined and discussed into something useful. How they are originally stated is unimportant. Changes to specs (as this is) need to pass the much higher bar of 1) doing something useful, and 2) doing it in a reasonable way. I'm in complete agreement with John's suggestions that POST needs to be the operative verb and that the additional parameters should be specified in a related header field. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
