On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Jim Popovitch <jim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Kurt Andersen (b) <kb...@drkurt.com> > wrote: > > > > While there have been options for mailing lists to "wrap" email > > conversations for a long time, many list administrators and participants > > have fairly violent objections to doing so. ARC is a mechanism to inform > > local policy decisions that does not require the intermediaries to take > > "ownership" of the mail via DMARC alignment on the mail from. > > How will ARC work with MLMs that wrap p=reject domains? It seems that > the wrap would still need to happen as MLMs have no input or idea of > local policy decisions. > There is, without a doubt, a certain degree of chicken/egg-ness about this whole thing. Mailing lists that currently wrap messages can continue to do so because it will take some time for receivers to implement ARC-informed local policy decisions. We have tried to tackle a fair number of these usage questions in the https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-arc-usage-00 document which was published at the same time as the more technically oriented spec. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
