On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Kurt Andersen (b) <kb...@drkurt.com> wrote: > +arc-discuss > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Jim Popovitch <jim...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> This has a feeling of "cart before the horse". :-) Mailman, and >> presumably other list mangers, now "wrap" dmarc'ed emails before >> forwarding, where's the value-add for ARC? > > > Jim, > > While there have been options for mailing lists to "wrap" email > conversations for a long time, many list administrators and participants > have fairly violent objections to doing so. ARC is a mechanism to inform > local policy decisions that does not require the intermediaries to take > "ownership" of the mail via DMARC alignment on the mail from.
Thanks for the clarity Kurt. In this day and age I feel that publishing an RFC is no longer enough, there has to be some sales effort to the idea, so it's good to see you advocating on-behalf of ARC. How will ARC work with MLMs that wrap p=reject domains? It seems that the wrap would still need to happen as MLMs have no input or idea of local policy decisions. -Jim P. _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
