On 28 Dec 2024, at 15:32, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: > I'm not really a fan of HTML signatures.
I'm not sure if anyone who really uses e-mails is. They're certainly against the spirit of the RFC and I always wondered about them. > It's one of those features which was only implemented due to a lot of > pressure from users. I mainly did it because some users are required to use a > specific HTML signature by their employer. They simply cannot use MailMate > without it. (And it must be applied to all outgoing emails.) You mean a block of text masquerading as markup isn't acceptable. Much as I prefer text/plain for e-mails, I'm a great fan of how MailMate lets me write plaintext but sends an HTML part for the Outlook victims who don't understand that the power of e-mail lies in expressing ourselves in words and not in markup. But would it be possible to add an indicator of the parts being sent. Charlie -- Charlie Clark Sengelsweg 34 Düsseldorf D- 40489 Mobile: +49-178-782-6226 _______________________________________________ mailmate mailing list Unsubscribe: https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
