&, if the comments are felt so strongly about the accessibility or lack there 
of. Wouldn't it be much better to comment to the FCC & not continue a thread 
which has gone on for ever?
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Barry Hadder 
  To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 17:16
  Subject: Re: FCC seeks comment on Amazons request for waiver of accessibility 
requirements


  I recall a time not so long ago when i devices first became accessible, 
everyone thinking how that was going to level the playing field.  It’s funny 
how quickly perspectives change.


  Now the bar has been raised even higher.  The playing field will not be level 
until blind people have access to every cheep piece of crap in existence.
  I should say that I’m happy with what Apple does and I have no desire to use 
anything else.  That said however, I certainly think that it would be a very 
good think if other companies would realize the importance of opening their 
products up to other segments of society and not excluding them.  I just don’t 
think that this is going to convince them.


  I don’t want to completely let Apple off the hook as it seems to me at times 
that there are factions under their roof that don’t seem to understand the 
importance of accessibility or what Voiceover is even used for.  On the other 
hand, I think that there is a much larger faction at Apple that definitely gets 
it and that the evidence to support this is over whelming.  I realize that not 
every body can listen to them, but there were some very impressive sessions at 
WWDC on the importance of accessibility and how easy it really is to not only 
make an app usable to a blind person, but make it a nice experience to use.


  I would like to suggest, that just maybe, if a government agency needs to 
step in to private inderestry and dictate to a company how their product is 
required to function, the result probably won’t be something you are going to 
want to use.


  I think that we as a blind community have access to more information then at 
any other time in history.  And, while things can always be better, maybe some 
gratitude is in order for the really good things that some companies like Apple 
have done.




  On Aug 7, 2013, at 12:36 PM, Richard Ring <richr...@gmail.com> wrote:


    And, let's face it! Not all blind people can afford i devices, nor should 
they have to! Having a relatively inexpensive Ereader would really help to 
level the playing field!



    You can have an off day, but you can't have a day off! ---The Art of 
Fielding
     Sent from my Mac Book Pro 
    richr...@gmail.com


    On Aug 7, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Eugenia Firth <gigifi...@me.com> wrote:


      Hi there 
      Yes, and we all know which "disability" they are talking about, and it's 
not the disabled they are talking about either. They are talking about the 
blind, but of course, they didn't say so. They might as well have. After all, 
most of the other disabilities can read the print. When I heard about this law, 
I had a feeling this kind of thing was going to start with the "we can't" 
people. 

      Hey, I guess you guys noticed how they want to solve the accessibility 
problem, right! They want to let Apple carrying them along by saying we can all 
use iPads etc.!
      Regards,
      Gigi

      Regards, 
      Gigi 

      On Aug 7, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Mike Arrigo <n0...@charter.net> wrote:


        I can't believe the FCC would even consider that. They should say, 
absolutely not. These devices must be made accessible, end of story.
        Original message:

          Hello all:



          In follow-up to Karen's post last night, I am posting information 
regarding FCC's request for comments on this issue. I hope that many of you 
will take the time to comment.
          Best,
          Donna
          Request for Comment on Petition for Class Waiver of Accessibility 
Rules for ACS



          On August 1, 2013, the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) 
released a Public Notice requesting comment on a petition filed by the 
Coalition of E-Reader Manufacturers. The Coalition requests that the Commission 
waive its rules requiring equipment used for advanced communications services 
(ACS) to be accessible by people with disabilities. The Coalition states that, 
although e-readers are equipment that consumers can use for ACS, they are 
designed primarily for reading.



          To distinguish e-readers from tablets and other devices that would 
not be subject to the waiver request, the Coalition requests a waiver for 
e-readers that have the following features:



          (1) they have no LCD screen;
          (2) they have no camera;
          (3) they are not offered or shipped to consumers with built-in ACS 
client applications and their manufacturers do not develop ACS applications for 
their respective devices, though the devices may include a browser and social 
media applications; and
          (4) they are marketed to consumers as reading devices and promotional 
material does not tout the capability to access ACS.



          Comment Deadline: September 3, 2013
          Reply Comment Deadline: September 13, 2013



          Links to the Public Notice (including filing instructions):




          (PDF) 
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-13-1686A1.pdf 
<http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-13-1686A1.pdf>
          (Word) 
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-13-1686A1.doc 
<http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-13-1686A1.doc>
          (Text) 
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-13-1686A1.txt 
<http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-13-1686A1.txt>



          Link to the Coalition Petition (May 15, 2013):
          http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022314526 
<http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022314526>



          Link to the Letter Supplementing the Coalition Petition (July 17, 
2013): http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520931307 
<http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520931307>



          For further information, please contact Eliot Greenwald at (202) 
418-2235 oreliot.greenw...@fcc.gov 
<mailto:eliot.greenw...@fcc.gov><mailto:eliot.greenw...@fcc.gov 
<mailto:eliot.greenw...@fcc.gov>>; or Rosaline Crawford at (202) 418-2075 
orrosaline.crawf...@fcc.gov 
<mailto:rosaline.crawf...@fcc.gov><mailto:rosaline.crawf...@fcc.gov 
<mailto:rosaline.crawf...@fcc.gov>>.
          --
          You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
          To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
send an email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
          To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
          Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries 
<http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries>.
          For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out 
<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>.


        -- 
        You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
        To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
        To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
        Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
        For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




      -- 
      You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
      To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
      To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
      Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
      For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.







    -- 
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
    To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
    Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
  Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
   
   

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to