And, let's face it! Not all blind people can afford i devices, nor should they 
have to! Having a relatively inexpensive Ereader would really help to level the 
playing field!


You can have an off day, but you can't have a day off! ---The Art of Fielding
 Sent from my Mac Book Pro 
richr...@gmail.com

On Aug 7, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Eugenia Firth <gigifi...@me.com> wrote:

> Hi there 
> Yes, and we all know which "disability" they are talking about, and it's not 
> the disabled they are talking about either. They are talking about the blind, 
> but of course, they didn't say so. They might as well have. After all, most 
> of the other disabilities can read the print. When I heard about this law, I 
> had a feeling this kind of thing was going to start with the "we can't" 
> people. 
> 
> Hey, I guess you guys noticed how they want to solve the accessibility 
> problem, right! They want to let Apple carrying them along by saying we can 
> all use iPads etc.!
> Regards,
> Gigi
> 
> Regards, 
> Gigi 
> 
> On Aug 7, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Mike Arrigo <n0...@charter.net> wrote:
> 
>> I can't believe the FCC would even consider that. They should say, 
>> absolutely not. These devices must be made accessible, end of story.
>> Original message:
>>> Hello all:
>> 
>>> In follow-up to Karen's post last night, I am posting information regarding 
>>> FCC's request for comments on this issue. I hope that many of you will take 
>>> the time to comment.
>>> Best,
>>> Donna
>>> Request for Comment on Petition for Class Waiver of Accessibility Rules for 
>>> ACS
>> 
>>> On August 1, 2013, the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) released a 
>>> Public Notice requesting comment on a petition filed by the Coalition of 
>>> E-Reader Manufacturers. The Coalition requests that the Commission waive 
>>> its rules requiring equipment used for advanced communications services 
>>> (ACS) to be accessible by people with disabilities. The Coalition states 
>>> that, although e-readers are equipment that consumers can use for ACS, they 
>>> are designed primarily for reading.
>> 
>>> To distinguish e-readers from tablets and other devices that would not be 
>>> subject to the waiver request, the Coalition requests a waiver for 
>>> e-readers that have the following features:
>> 
>>> (1) they have no LCD screen;
>>> (2) they have no camera;
>>> (3) they are not offered or shipped to consumers with built-in ACS client 
>>> applications and their manufacturers do not develop ACS applications for 
>>> their respective devices, though the devices may include a browser and 
>>> social media applications; and
>>> (4) they are marketed to consumers as reading devices and promotional 
>>> material does not tout the capability to access ACS.
>> 
>>> Comment Deadline: September 3, 2013
>>> Reply Comment Deadline: September 13, 2013
>> 
>>> Links to the Public Notice (including filing instructions):
>> 
>> 
>>> (PDF) http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-13-1686A1.pdf 
>>> <http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-13-1686A1.pdf>
>>> (Word) http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-13-1686A1.doc 
>>> <http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-13-1686A1.doc>
>>> (Text) http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-13-1686A1.txt 
>>> <http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-13-1686A1.txt>
>> 
>>> Link to the Coalition Petition (May 15, 2013):
>>> http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022314526 
>>> <http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022314526>
>> 
>>> Link to the Letter Supplementing the Coalition Petition (July 17, 2013): 
>>> http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520931307 
>>> <http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520931307>
>> 
>>> For further information, please contact Eliot Greenwald at (202) 418-2235 
>>> oreliot.greenw...@fcc.gov 
>>> <mailto:eliot.greenw...@fcc.gov><mailto:eliot.greenw...@fcc.gov 
>>> <mailto:eliot.greenw...@fcc.gov>>; or Rosaline Crawford at (202) 418-2075 
>>> orrosaline.crawf...@fcc.gov 
>>> <mailto:rosaline.crawf...@fcc.gov><mailto:rosaline.crawf...@fcc.gov 
>>> <mailto:rosaline.crawf...@fcc.gov>>.
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries 
>>> <http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries>.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out 
>>> <https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> 
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to