Why do you strongly suggest this? I've done it, and am not trying to be difficult; I'm just trying to ascertain the reasoning. To my way of thinking, having the conversation's messages grouped in a triangle which I can just click on to expand, even if I"I've already trashed some of the individual messages, might be a really useful thing, especially if the conversation is extremely technical or melodramatic. As far as the number of reported messages being inaccurate when VO speaks it, simple math should suffice to make the tally come out even between the number of messages reported by VO, the number of messages actually in the table that you can arrow through and the number of disclosure triangles and their contents, also reported by VO. Still, I've unchecked this box; maybe it's just easier this way.
• Mark BurningHawk Baxter • AIM, Skype and Twitter: BurningHawk1969 • MSN: burninghawk1...@hotmail.com • My home page: • http://MarkBurningHawk.net/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
