If you haven't already done so, you might check out my pod casts on 
blindcooltech for my voiceover experiences.
On Feb 3, 2011, at 12:44 AM, brandt wrote:

> Hi Tim,
> 
> As a current windows user, I have to say that negative podcasts such as 
> "Voiceover on" will keep the windows users, windows users and drive newby mac 
> users away. I am still going to swich, but almost decided not to after 
> listening to the first 6 episodes of "voiceover is broaken"
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Brandt Steenkamp
> 
> MSN/Windows live: brandt...@live.com
> 
> Google talk: brandt.steenk...@gmail.com
> 
> AIM: brandt.steenk...@gmail.com
> 
> Skype: brandt.steenkamp007
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Kilburn" <kilbu...@shaw.ca>
> To: <macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 8:04 AM
> Subject: Re: iWOrk: VoiceOver Falls Short
> 
> 
> Hi Kevin,
> 
> I spent some time listening to your suggested podcast and am a little annoyed 
> with your approach and attitude presented within it.  While your comments 
> below suggest a welcomeness to constructive comments and/or workarounds, your 
> tone within the podcast itself is very critical of VO. Much of this 
> criticism, in my opinion, is due to a lack of experience with the product 
> itself.  You and your partner appear well versed in the use of JAWS and are 
> using that wealth of experience to attempt a comparison with a product that 
> you do not have the same familiarity with.  Therefore, your conclusions seem 
> rather tilted.
> 
> Now, I do appreciate your efforts in providing the podcast episodes, as such 
> comparisons are useful.  Simply to eliminate the judgemental comments would 
> make them more palatable from my prospective.  As I've noticed from much of 
> the suggestions supplied by Anne Robertson, much of what you criticized with 
> respect to VO is actually doable.  I might also add, that many of these are 
> not necessarily "workarounds", but really just a different way of approaching 
> things.  For the most part, we all have to realize that VO and the MacOS is 
> not Windows, nor do I want it to be, so if we must do things a little 
> differently, then so be it.
> 
> Now for some specifics:
> 
> • In Numbers, you made fun of Numbers saying "B4" with the word "Cell" and 
> quipped about not needing to hear the word "Cell" since you knew that you 
> were in a spreadsheet.  You also mentioned that there was no way that you 
> could stop it from saying the word "Cell".  In this case, you are inaccurate, 
> simply set your default verbosity to "Low" and VO will not say the word 
> "Cell" anymore.
> 
> I will readily admit that JAWS handles MS products very well and I'm not 
> trying to say that VO handles iWork just as well, my objections are with your 
> perceived expertise with VO during the comparison and your over-critical 
> tone.  Your obvious comfort level with JAWS allows for the ease of use 
> whereas that same level of comfort is not apparent for VO. These 
> inconsistencies are brought home considerably when I read the 
> comments/suggestions from Anne.
> 
> Maybe, instead of making such judgements, you could preface your comments 
> with phrases like, "In my experience with VO thus far", or " I haven't 
> figured out how to do whatever yet, but there may be someone who's more 
> familiar than me with it".  I feel that this would give your podcast a more 
> professional tone and consequently, add validity to it.  In it's current 
> state, I would not be inclined to listen to further episodes.
> 
> Just my thoughts.
> 
> Later...
> 
> On 2011-01-31, at 3:58 PM, Kevin Chao wrote:
> 
>> Please have a listen to latest, episode 6 of VOiceOVer On podcast, where 
>> APple iWork and  Microsoft Office screen reader accessibility are compared.
>> http://VoiceOverOn.podbean.com
>> 
>> If any are aware of  work-arounds, -, solutions or  any feedback , 
>> specifically on content; please provide it with   very specific  steps.
>> 
>> Apple Accessibility are made aware of all these issues, both text and audio  
>> form, which they are more than fine with  the podcast.
>> 
>> Goal of VOiceOver On podcast is  to highlight   the good, bad and ugly of 
>> VoiceOver. THis allows for people to be aware. More importantly, for APple 
>> to be aware of issues in a variety of formats, which will allow for these 
>> issues to be addressed at a later point.
>> 
>> Kevin
>> ,
>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Ben Mustill-Rose wrote:
>> 
>>> You know, I'm not exactly the biggest apple fan on here, but if those
>>> are all the bugs that are present in iWork, I have to say thats pretty
>>> impressive. I can't right now, but I'm sure that if I had time, I
>>> could come up with many more bugs that one could find using a windows
>>> screenreader and office.
>>> I'm all for talking about a products weeknesses, but it seems like
>>> your podcast exists purely to expose the bad points about voiceover,
>>> despite its name.
>>> 
>>> On 31/01/2011, Ray Foret Jr <rfore...@att.net> wrote:
>>>> And your point is?
>>>> 
>>>> I assume you've contacted the Apple accessibility people about this?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>> The Constantly Barefooted Ray!!!
>>>> 
>>>> Now A Very Proud and very happy Mac user!!!
>>>> 
>>>> Skype Name:
>>>> barefootedray
>>>> 
>>>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Kevin Chao wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Below are various aspects  of iWork, when it comes to content
>>>>> browsing/viewing, where VoiceOver falls short.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Pages
>>>>> * VoiceOver find doesn't ' always work, which requires arrowing around
>>>>> document and repeating find.
>>>>> * Going from end of page to next page, a sound indicates page turn;
>>>>> VoiceOver is silent and doesn't read first line of following page.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Numbers
>>>>> * Navigating  around, Voiceover will double/triple speak cell
>>>>> coordinates, speak word "cell" and order in which info is read isn't
>>>>> consistent.
>>>>> 
>>>>> KeyNote
>>>>> * Slide show view, interact with table, VoiceOver doesn't see slide
>>>>> content. Doesn't matter if it's a KeyNote document or PowerPoint 2003.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kevin
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
> 
> Tim Kilburn
> Fort McMurray, AB Canada
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to