Mahalo to all the help with deleting app with vo. I don't use vo on the
phone but my partner does. Any help I can give her makes using the iPhone
more fun for her and married life easier on me.


On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 4:59 AM, Joe Plummer <joeplum...@tds.net> wrote:

> Hi, you can delete the app by doing this. Find the app you want to delete
> and then double tap and hold this will put it in a edit mode. Then just
> chose delete on that app. Now this will only work on app that you
> installed.
> Also the next time you go to sync make sure you uncheck this app under the
> app tab or it will be put back on the phone. The other way is do it in
> iTunes. You can do this by hooking your phone to your PC or Mac and in
> iTunes go to your iPhone and look under the app tab and uncheck the app
> that
> you don't want on your phone any more. Then sync your iPhone. This should
> remove this app from the phone. Now this will not un install it from the
> computer. Hopes this helps.
>
>
> Sign,
> JP ( Joe Plummer)
> joeplum...@tds.net
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Charlie Doremus
> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 6:14 AM
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Subject: deleting an app from an iphone using vo
>
> How does one delete an unwanted app from iPhone with vo running?
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Krister Ekstrom
> <kris...@kristersplace.com> wrote:
>
>
>        I started my current Mac experience by borrowing a Mac Mini from a
> vendor who sold assistive technology for Windows. I wanted to prove that
> what they said about the mac was wrong, that they couldn't use it
> effectively as blind folks. I dumped my old pc and started use the Mac full
> time from the beginning and i haven't looked back since. True i have a
> virtual machine but that's mostly for playing audio games that are not
> available on the Mac yet. I do not miss the single key keystrokes much and
> i'm so glad i got rid of that virtual buffer and all the other ways windows
> screen reading software spoon feeds us.
>        /Krister
>        12 feb 2010 kl. 09.13 skrev Nicolai Svendsen:
>
>        > Hi,
>        >
>        > I use VoiceOver the most, and I'm way more efficient using
> VoiceOver now. I found that, if you were loading absolutely massive
> webpages, JAWS/Window Eyes first had to load all the contents into their
> virtual buffer before you could do as much as navigate. I personally see
> that as a huge drawback to efficiency. The only reason JAWS or Window-Eyes,
> not to mention NVDA among others take advantage of one-letter navigation
> keys in HTML environments is probably because they have that drawback.
> VoiceOVer might be able to, but the issue would be that, if you're in a
> form
> field, you'd need Forms mode which I'm so glad to get rid of. With a
> Windows-based screenreader, you have to exit forms mode, then use H to go
> to
> the next heading, whereas with VoiceOver you can simply do it within the
> field itself due to separate commands. That'll still slow you down, no
> matter how fast you are. It's still an extra keystroke, regardless of
> Auto-forms mode. You still have to exit it one way or the other.
>        >
>        > Just as a note, I can actually hit VO-H with one  hand without
> much effort. I can't hit VO-Shift-H, but if I have to use that keystroke
> I'll  just use the right shift key.
>        >
>        > You knew what you were getting into, though. You knew the
> functionality existed, but it's bound to be different as it's an entirely
> different operating system. I can't stress that enough.
>        >
>        > Suggestion: Dump your Windows computer in the trash and spend all
> time on the Mac. You always have virtual machines if you need to do
> something you know you can only do on Windows, but the way you'll really
> get
> efficient in navigation with VoiceOver is to get rid of  all Window-sbased
> solutions and just suck it up when something is a bit different. I say that
> because that worked for me, and it's the best thing I ever did. It's not an
> insult to any new switchers, just something to consider. I yet have to
> understand why people buy Macbook Pros if they might not even like the
> operating system or the screenreader. Just something I've been wondering,
> since it's mostly people who have never used Macs who seem to buy them. Or,
> at least, people who hardly have used Macs or even people who aren't open
> to
> the idea of using a Mac.
>        >
>        > Regards,
>        > Nic
>        > Skype: Kvalme
>        > MSN Messenger: nico...@home3.gvdnet.dk
>        > AIM: cincinster
>        > yahoo Messenger: cin368
>        > Facebook Profile
>        > My Twitter
>        >
>        > On Feb 12, 2010, at 1:38 AM, Scott Howell wrote:
>        >
>        >> Mary,
>        >>
>        >> What I was pointing out is that jumping from heading to heading
> may not be as simple as just pressing h, but the functionality still
> exists,
> even if you have to hold some additional keys down. In the end you use what
> works best for you. YOu say browsing using IE on windows is more efficient
> for you and that is great, but for me I have found ways of becoming very
> efficient using VO and Safari. In fact I prefer in nearly all cases now,
> using VO and Safari. There was a time I may have agreed with you, but as I
> really became comfortable with VO and the entire Mac experience, I really
> have no use for windows or windows-based screen readers. Well the only
> reason I use windows personally is for some courses I am taking that use
> news groups and so far outlook express is the only choice I have found thus
> far and since most the materials have to be produced using Word, I have to
> drag that out. Otherwise, I honestly do find the Mac works well for me.
> Again, you use what works for you because being efficient and productive is
> most important.
>        >> On Feb 11, 2010, at 7:23 PM, Mary Otten wrote:
>        >>
>        >>> Hi Scott,
>        >>> I'm not Linda, but I had to respond to your note to her re the
> differences between moving around on a page among elements with Window Eyes
> or Jaws and Voice Over. You said that you didn't see much difference
> between
> pressing h by itself or pressing 3 additional keys in addition to h to move
> among headers. And you say this is easily done with one hand? You must have
> amazing hands. I can no way do that. I've been touch typing for decades. It
> gets even more interesting when you add the shift into the mix to go up the
> page in reverse order. Doable? yes? As easy as pressing one key? Not by a
> long shot. Are there other benefits, such as not having to go in and out of
> forms mode? for sure. The added functionality for VO on the web in Snow
> Leopard is one of the main reasons I decided to try a Mac. I really
> appreciate the numpad commander, although learning it was not as intuitive
> as learning mnemonics on the regular keyboard. In no way is the rotor as
> efficient for me as having that array of single letter keystrokes that let
> me move among various web elements at will. Another thing I hope can be
> implemented in the future is a means of letting focus return to where it
> was
> when you return back to a previously visited page. That's a big time saver
> with the Windows screen readers, although it  doesn't always work. Its
> nonexistent with vo. I like the fact that pages seem to load faster with
> Safari than they do with IE and a screen reader. Over all, for me, the
> Windows experience is still more efficient. But there are pluses with the
> Mac, and I'm hoping it will keep improving. Group mode is something I have
> tried and dropped. I just never found a page where it seemed to offer any
> advantage, since I don't really care how the page is laid out. I want info
> and where it is on the page just doesn't seem very important to me, so long
> as I can get to it efficiently. Maybe I don't go to the right sites where
> group mode's benefits are displayed to best advantage.
>        >>>
>        >>> Mary
>        >>>
>        >>> --
>        >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>        >>> To post to this group, send email to
> macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>        >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<macvisionaries%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> <mailto:macvisionaries%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com<macvisionaries%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>>
> .
>        >>> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>        >>>
>        >>
>        >> --
>        >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>        >> To post to this group, send email to
> macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>        >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<macvisionaries%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> <mailto:macvisionaries%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com<macvisionaries%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>>
> .
>        >> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>        >>
>        >
>        > --
>        > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>        > To post to this group, send email to
> macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>        > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<macvisionaries%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> <mailto:macvisionaries%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com<macvisionaries%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>>
> .
>        > For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>        >
>
>        --
>        You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>        To post to this group, send email to
> macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>        To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<macvisionaries%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> <mailto:macvisionaries%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com<macvisionaries%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>>
> .
>        For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Check out our web site, www.giantdolphin.com
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<macvisionaries%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<macvisionaries%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
Check out our web site, www.giantdolphin.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to