Hey, On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:35 AM Mojca Miklavec <mo...@macports.org> wrote: > > Dear Karan, > > you may put such statistics and suggestions for action plans in the proposal > (or appendix to proposal).
Ok, I'll do that soon > What about pypackage -> py-pypackage? (I miss such entries on the list, > unless those are the ones you intentionally didn't count.) They are counted under package -> py-package (769) as I had just applied a split on "py-". Will generate the detailed stats if necessary. > Did you ignore capitalisation of names? Yep > Mojca > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 22:51, KARAN SHETH <karan.sh...@somaiya.edu> wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> Just to see how many ports will we have to rename if we take on this >> path I ran a quick script and following were the results: >> >> PyPI Name Macports Name Number >> >> package package 10 >> >> package py-package 769 >> >> package py-pypackage 1 >> >> pypackage py-package 14 >> >> -------------- unclassified 30 >> >> Total PyPI Ports = 824 >> >> So according to this results it would be best to name all the PyPI as >> py-package. >> >> Note: The script might be a bit off. >> >> Thanks, >> Karan Sheth -- <https://www.somaiya.edu> <http://www.somaiya-ayurvihar.org> <http://nareshwadi.org> <http://somaiya.com> <http://www.helpachild.in> <http://nareshwadi.org>
