Hey, Just to see how many ports will we have to rename if we take on this path I ran a quick script and following were the results:
PyPI Name Macports Name Number package package 10 package py-package 769 package py-pypackage 1 pypackage py-package 14 -------------- unclassified 30 Total PyPI Ports = 824 So according to this results it would be best to name all the PyPI as py-package. Note: The script might be a bit off. Thanks, Karan Sheth On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:10 PM Mojca Miklavec <mo...@macports.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 01:33, KARAN SHETH wrote: >> >> >> Is it possible to rename the existing Python ports as per PYPI so that >> issues of duplicates ports can be avoided? > > > Yes, I would be in favour of coming up with an "algorithm" for naming all > python ports and then stick to it. Ports which don't follow the convention > could and should be renamed. > > Pypi packages might be called "foo", "pyfoo", "py-foo", ... and we just need > to agree on how to do the name transformation in some well-defined way. Some > maintainers changed "pyfoo" into "py-foo", others into "py-pyfoo". This needs > to be unified. > > Mojca > -- <https://www.somaiya.edu> <http://www.somaiya-ayurvihar.org> <http://nareshwadi.org> <http://somaiya.com> <http://www.helpachild.in> <http://nareshwadi.org>
