On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> wrote:
I'm not so sure. If someone were to write a converter that mapped LyX's XML
onto ODT's, or whatever, then yes. But that would still need doing.

Yes, of course.  However, I think it should be easier to write such
XSLs to map from a straightforward LyX XML schema than from LyXHTML
output.  The latter depends too much on the document class and has
issues, while the former should preserve everything about the original
.lyx as much as possible.

Nico
--

And it would be easier for the final user the fact that all converters can operate automatically inside the LyX, instead of calling them, so you would see that copying a MathML equation in LOWriter and then pasting in LyX would result in a LyX equation where you insert them instead of having to convert it to latex using whatever script you have and the copy paste inside an equation box (is there an easier way right now? I think my way is too much omplicated), the same for figures (you don't need to save the image and then load it from LyX, just paste it where you want it) and tables (I think this is a lot more complicated example, but there is XLST converter).

Alex

Reply via email to