Guenter Milde wrote: > There is already a feature request for proper support of "includeonly". > Maybe you can add to it.
And the feature is already implemented in Lyx 2.0. However, > Includeonly support will > > 1. require caching of aux files > 2. add vast time saving for large documents made of several files. I don't see how this can be done. Without regenerating the aux files, we cannot determine whether the aux files (i.e. the counters) will change. To put it differently: it can be done, but only at the cost of probably incorrect output. Jürgen
