On Thu, 10 May 2007 08:24:34 +0200
"Julio Rojas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> What I'm really amazed of, is the quantity of technical and
> engineering congresses that "ask" the authors to submit their papers
> is Word format and don't have (and don't support) LaTeX styles.
> 
> I'm doing some evangelism with my friends that are working on their
> PhD's to switch to LyX/LaTeX. They instantly love the typesetting, the
> styles and the formula typing. The problem is not only congresses
> their making articles for, but their own tutors don't work and never
> have worked with LaTeX. That by itself, stop them in their effort. If
> at least LyX/LaTeX generated PDF's could be commented by default (or
> using a switch), their switch would be smoother.

I proof read and commented a friend's thesis that they wrote in latex and which 
was sent to me as pdf or ps.
This used flpsed which places a comment into the a ps or pdf.  Only
one series of comments can be done. 
Later I was able to check to comments using psdiff.
It all worked perfectly.  There was a very tight time schedule and I was able 
to easily submit the proofs to the author who went to  submit the final version 
on time. 

flpsed: http://www.ecademix.com/JohannesHofmann/flpsed.html
psdiff: http://www.intermemory.org/pny/software/psdiff/main.html
I used Linux and the flsped is available as a Ubuntu deb package.

Annotating pdf? no excuses now!

cheers

Russell

> 
> On 5/9/07, David L. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Steve Litt wrote:
> >
> > > Big publishers like O'Reilly (or in the case of my Samba Unleashed, Sams) 
> > > take
> > > complete control of the book's layout. Working with a mainstream 
> > > publisher is
> > > the ultimate WYSIWYM experience -- you as the author are responsible only 
> > > for
> > > content. Your publisher gives you a list of styles you may (and must) use 
> > > and
> > > a stylesheet telling how and when to use them. You do that, and the 
> > > publisher
> > > takes care of the rest.
> > >
> > > If the publisher were to accept a LyX document (or LaTeX), they'd either 
> > > need
> > > to accept the author's layout (bad idea when you publish a uniform series
> > > like Unleashed or Nutshell), or they'd need to translate back into MS Word
> > > with appropriate styles.
> >
> > Not at all.  Some publishers (granted, all I know about are math
> > journals, which form a biased and tiny subset of publishers) simply
> > require you to use their specific TeX style files --- which is easy to
> > do in TeX, and not so bad in LyX either, in fact, some of the Springer
> > styles (kluwer) are already included in LyX.  No reason to translate
> > into Word.  Also, going from one TeX style to another is far easier than
> > trying to do the same thing in Word.
> > >
> > > Another reason they use MS Word is because MS Word has facilities to track
> > > changes, so the chapter documents that keep getting sent back and forth
> > > contain a complete history of queries, reponses and changes.
> >
> > This is also easy to do in LyX/TeX, but it is also dangerous to keep
> > such information in a document by default.  It can be very embarrassing,
> > say, in a job offer letter, to be able to see what the original salary
> > offer was, before upper management cut it by 25%.  This may be less of a
> > problem in this case, but still unwanted information can be transmitted.
> > >
> > > Of course, one could ask "why not make LyX the official "wordprocessor"
> > > instead of MS Word, and supply a LyX layout instead of a MS Word style
> > > template. The answer is simply that it's very hard to find willing and
> > > qualified authors for the amount mainstream publishers are willing to pay,
> > > and it would be far easier to get the few LyX/LaTeX users to switch to MS
> > > Word than to get the multitudes of MS Word users to switch to LyX, which 
> > > many
> > > haven't heard of, don't have, and don't know how to install.
> >
> > This should be less of a concern for the likes of O'Reilly, who really
> > do support open source, the antithesis of MS practice.
> >
> > --
> >
> > David L. Johnson
> >
> > Let's be straight here.  If we find something we can't understand
> > we like to call it something you can't understand,
> > or indeed even pronounce.  -- Douglas Adams
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> -------------------------------------------------
> Julio Rojas
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
Please, if possible, don't send me MS Word or Powerpoint attachments.
Send plain text, rich text format, html, or pdf instead.
Why? See: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/sylvester-response.html

Reply via email to