Lars Gullik Bjønnes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Note that code share is in the very high 90's %.
Really? Did not know that. So, it means that, in case qt goes non-gpl or something, it would not be too hard to port to another toolkit? > It is packaging that takes time, and you won't get that from just > using a multi-platform lib. (qt-linux, qt-mac, qt-win) Do you mean preparing the build or extra stuff which has to be included like in win32 port? > But I guess topic should be brought back to more LyX relevant musings. Isn't the future and LyX ports very relevant topic ;) Sincerely, Gour -- Registered Linux User | #278493 GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
