Kathryn Andersen wrote:
> > This answers my question short term, but begs the question of how does
> > one get the fonts one wants to render correctly.  Some Journals have
> > font requirements (TimesRoman usually) and while you can always submit
> > paper copies, many want electronicly viewable versions to send out for
> > faster review.
> 
> Er... pslatex uses Times as the base font.
> The default base font for Lyx/Tex is Computer Modern.

[Harry makes another, typically urbane, erudite, and debonair entry to yet another 
list.]  
Well, if I knew everything, I wouldn't be on this list.. :)
Thanks very much for the correction, and especially the expansion below.

> 
> > I suspect that it's a typeface naming or embedding problem, but since
> > acrobat is supposed to be able to embed type 1 fonts, which is what
> > the majority of these are, why doesn't this work correctly?
> 
> When I was investigating this, I found that Acrobat never embeds Times
> because it is one of the "standard" fonts which it always uses (the
> other two being Courier and Helvetica/Arial).  This actually gave me
> trouble because Times (standard Postscript font that it is) is slightly
> different from Times Roman.  Since I was generating my original file on
> a Linux system, it used Times.  But the person printing out the PDF file
> was using a Windows system, and got Times Roman, and the kerning or size
> was slightly different, which meant that all words with a certain letter
> in them (I think it was "o") had an unsightly gap -- which is no good if
> you are using the PDF files as masters for a magazine!
> 
> So I changed my base font to Utopia (after making sure to upgrade my
> Ghostscript to one more recent than 5.50, because that version renders
> ugly fonts in PDF because they're all bitmapped instead of outlined).
> That worked fine, because the font was embedded, so it rendered the same
> on both machines.

Fabulous - I seem to have utopia already installed.  I'll do the same and see what 
develops cross platform.

Many thanks again for setting me straight.

Best Wishes,
Harry

Reply via email to