"Piotr R. Sidorowicz" wrote: > My suggestion, avail yourself of two removable HD trays and an extra HD > (one for W2K, other for Linux), so you can swap from one to the other. > I do not recommend both OSes on the same HD, as the Redmond product > doesn't play nice, and has a nasty habit of corrupting > "unrecognized" partitions. I found out the hard way, so take my word on > this. You must be one of the few people on earth that has problems with this. I would certainly never recommend going to such extremes. I tend to keep all partitions primary, and that keep Windows from fudging with them. But even that is something most people don't have a problem with. Peter
- What's a better platform - win2k or Linux Vladimir Milovanovic
- Re: What's a better platform - win2k or Linux John Levon
- Re: What's a better platform - win2k or Linux Andre Poenitz
- Re: What's a better platform - win2k or Linux Ronny Buchmann
- Re: What's a better platform - win2k or Linux Frank Derichsweiler
- Re: What's a better platform - win2k or Linux Piotr R. Sidorowicz
- Re: What's a better platform - win2k or Linu... Rod Pinna
- [OT] VMware comments Frank Derichsweiler
- Re: What's a better platform - win2k or Linux Peter S Galbraith
- Re: What's a better platform - win2k or Linux Piotr R. Sidorowicz
- Re: What's a better platform - win2k or Linux Ronald Florence
- Re: What's a better platform - win2k or Linu... Piotr R. Sidorowicz