On 10/14/21 4:21 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021, Rich Shepard wrote:
I'll scroll through it, too.
Latest latex.log:
Package biblatex Info: Trying to load language 'english'...
Package biblatex Info: ... file 'english.lbx' found.
(/usr/share/texmf-dist/tex/latex/biblatex/lbx/english.lbx
File: english.lbx 2019/12/01 v3.14 biblatex localization (PK/MW)
)
Package biblatex Info: Input encoding 'utf8' detected.
Package biblatex Info: Automatic encoding selection.
(biblatex) Assuming data encoding 'utf8'.
\openout3 = `biological-evaluation.bcf'.
But,
Package biblatex Info: Trying to load bibliographic data...
Package biblatex Info: ... file 'biological-evaluation.bbl' not found.
No file biological-evaluation.bbl.
The MWE latex.log:
Package biblatex Info: Trying to load biblatex default data model...
Package biblatex Info: ... file 'blx-dm.def' found.
(/usr/share/texmf-dist/tex/latex/biblatex/blx-dm.def
File: blx-dm.def 2019/12/01 v3.14 biblatex localization (PK/MW)
)
Package biblatex Info: Trying to load biblatex style data model...
Package biblatex Info: ... file 'authoryear.dbx' not found.
Package biblatex Info: Trying to load biblatex custom data model...
Package biblatex Info: ... file 'biblatex-dm.cfg' not found.
Other than the page style in the MWE, what else might account for the
differences?
Rich
Just to be clear, is the attached log from the same MWE that we have
(just references, nothing else) and does the MWE (with input encoding
set to UTF-8) compile for you? The log seems to indicate that it does.
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
