Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| >>>>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Abdelrazak> I really think we should get rid of iconv.
| > We are going to need iconv anyway to convert characters to iso-8859-x
| > and friends for latex output.
|
| By the way, if we are going to encapsulate Qt unicode table we could
| as well encapsulate QString conversion facilities including all 8bit
| locales:
Using Qt for something does not imply using it for everything.
And if we can easily stay away and use more widespread/portable
libs/code then we should do that.
I am not sure iconv is any more portable than Qt. But even if so, Qt API
is way more simpler than iconv API and I care about simplicity.
Abdel.
