Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > writes:
| >
| > | No, but IMO it should still be possible to compile trunk with a system
| > | boost 1.33. See my patch in http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2677
| > | for a quick and dirty solution.
| >
| > (wasn't that quick and dirty solution for a system 1.34?)
|
| Yes, but it shows the places where 1.33 and 1.34 are not source compatible
| that matter for LyX.
Right.
| > The problem is that a system boost 1.33(.2) does not work with lyx...
| > it has some problems that are only fixed in svn. (the fix copied
| > to our in-source copy as well.)
|
| What problems? Are there others than the gcc-4.1 related bug 2677?
| If there are serious problems then compatibility is of course not important.
| We should however have a configure test that complains if system boost is
| choosen and if that is too old.
Yes. A '#include <boost/visit_each.hpp>' is at least missing in fc5's
version of boost/bind.hpp.
| We also need to think about 1.4.
What is the problem with included boost there?
--
Lgb
