Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Author: kuemmel >> Date: Wed Jun 21 12:30:32 2006 >> New Revision: 14166 >> >> Log: >> fix: qt3/qt4 save/restore of the window geometry and maximize status > > Try to be more verbose next time Peter. The SVN log is there to let us > know what has changed without having to svn diff in the future. > > Abdel. > >
Haven't we discussed the patch on the list? I don't wanna explain all the stuff again in the log message. <annoyed>But don't worry,</annoyed> I do not plan to commit anything in the next time. The cmake build is quite stable (even if it is not of interest), the Qt4 version is too slow, using Qt3 is a dead-end-street, and the other frontends are not portable. It seems to me LyX needs a complete redesign, but I don't think this is possible without years of discussions. The process when contributing to lyx is way too complicated for me. It's maybe good for the stability of the code but it is not good for the progress. I'm so glad to have finished this maximized patch, and don't wanna start the next odyssey. There are so much special rules, the infrastructure is not ready (svn messages without diff, no view svn), much energy is wasted on trivia, too much frontends. OK, I liked the traffic on the list, this is really an active project. Sorry for the LyX-blasphemous words, but I couldn't stop me saying this after hacking LyX for some weeks Peter
