John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 12:07:32AM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote: | | > I must confess that this patch will break CT in some cases | | Why is there such pushback against making branches for stuff that's | *known* broken?
I have no idea... it seems all my suggestions on using branches is put
down without even trying.
--
Lgb
