On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 09:19:17PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > I must confess that this patch will break CT in some cases > > > > Why is there such pushback against making branches for stuff that's > > *known* broken? > > Because maintaining branches is an extra effort that eats resources. > Even in the subversion era.
Here it's just a vector for making patches for review. I don't have any idea where you think this resource-eating happens. regards john