On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 09:19:17PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:

> > > I must confess that this patch will break CT in some cases
> > 
> > Why is there such pushback against making branches for stuff that's
> > *known* broken?
> 
> Because maintaining branches is an extra effort that eats resources.
> Even in the subversion era.

Here it's just a vector for making patches for review. I don't have any
idea where you think this resource-eating happens.

regards
john

Reply via email to