Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 00:07 +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
| > Folks,
| >
| > this is the next part of the CT cleanup.
| >
| > I must confess that this patch will break CT in some cases (but not
| > compilation, of course!). However, as I redesign the internal data
| > structures (change tracking is no longer an "add-on" but an integral
| > part of any paragraph and inset) it was impossible for me to find
| > another self-contained set of changes that can be applied without
| > breaking anything. I think we have to live with a broken CT for a week
| > or two now (depending on how fast you accept my incremental changes).
| >
| > Please have a look at the patch and tell me whether it is OK. Its
| > overall objective is to make things simpler and clearer.
|
| Precisely what breaks?
|
| I have no time right now to spend on LyX, but I think this should be
| fixed before checking in. Or perhaps this is the time to give 'feature
| branch' a try.
Right. The patch itself looked ok to me. I liked the removal of some
of the markErased functions etc. But I am wary of inconsistent trunk,
we should work realy hard to have that not happen.
--
Lgb
