>>>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Here is the patch. It took me a bit longer than I thought Abdelrazak> because I did not understand the logic in the cursor in Abdelrazak> breakParagraph(). With my former patch one call to Abdelrazak> needsUpdateCounter on next_par was enough. With the Abdelrazak> ParIterator version I need to test both current and next Abdelrazak> par in order to cover all the cases. Anyway, double-check Abdelrazak> is maybe better. It is strange that the need for a double call is different. Abdelrazak> OK to apply to 1.5svn? Yes for me. I like the patch. Abdelrazak> Maybe it is too late for 1.4.1 but please give it a test Abdelrazak> ride. There is nothing intrusive in there. It is indeed late for 1.4.1, but it will definitely go in 1.4.2. BTW, do you really need the default: case in your switch? It is better to avoid them in general... JMarc
