Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
This is why I had to write "it++" instead of "it+1" in some cases.
Just browing an interesting thread. You're doing great things here Abdel!
Thanks. But I have to convince Lars...
I highlighted the line above because language issues require less thought
than a real code review ;-)
I would be very happy if you could review my code.
"++it" is generally preferable to "it++" for non-pointer iterators (one
less copy).
Of course, it++ is the best replacement for it+1 but for it+n and n>1 the
portable idiom would be "std::advance(it, n);" IIRC.
I know that and I always try to remember to use ++it instead of it++.
But you know when doing things quickly...
Thanks,
Abdel
