Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > This is why I had to write "it++" instead of "it+1" in some cases.
Just browing an interesting thread. You're doing great things here Abdel! I highlighted the line above because language issues require less thought than a real code review ;-) "++it" is generally preferable to "it++" for non-pointer iterators (one less copy). Of course, it++ is the best replacement for it+1 but for it+n and n>1 the portable idiom would be "std::advance(it, n);" IIRC. Regards, -- Angus
