On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 13:47 +0100, Helge Hafting wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > >Hmmm. Actually this is straightforwardly fixable. It's just a policy > >choice, how we understand noFontChange(). See attached. Only text.C and > >rowpainter.C were changed. Works for me... 1.3 does it this way too (in > >fact, it has *only* noFontChange-type insets; but language is inherited > >into all of them. So I guess this is a regression fix.) > > > > > Excellent! > Applying a language over a selection now takes effect inside > all sorts of insets. I am running out of language complaints. ;-) > The only inset not affected is ERT, but that is as expected. > > I also tested that pasting insets into a region with different > language doesn't change language inside the inset. > > Language and language changes are now they way they should be. > > Helge Hafting
Thanks! Jean-Marc, I think this is the version of reference to review. (Do we still make 1.4.0, or shall we play safe? But it's quite irritating as it is. Do we want the possible embarrassment or the certain annoyance?) - Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
