Jose' Matos wrote: > On Tuesday 10 January 2006 08:05, Georg Baum wrote: >> >> No. First I think the input is not a valid .lyx file, and second this bug >> is present in 1.3.6, too (so no regression), and third if it really >> should be a valid .lyx file it is a very uncommon one, so almost nobody >> will notice whether this is fixed or not. > > Clearly this seems to be another example of a 1.2 file without the > initial > Standard layout.
It is a bit different than bug 2088: Here even the "\layout" tag is missing, in bug 2088 we have at least a "\layout" tag. > Either 1.2 really was able to produce such files or people took > advantage of > the fact that lyx 1.3 and 1.2 was able to read them. > > If the first it is easy to get a fix, if the second should we be nice > and > support those files since previous lyx versions supported it? In case of bug 2088: yes, but in this case I think it becomes too complicated: How do we know when the header ends and the document begins if we can not wait for \layout? Georg
