On Tuesday 10 January 2006 09:09, Georg Baum wrote: > Jose' Matos wrote: > > On Tuesday 10 January 2006 08:05, Georg Baum wrote: > >> No. First I think the input is not a valid .lyx file, and second this > >> bug is present in 1.3.6, too (so no regression), and third if it really > >> should be a valid .lyx file it is a very uncommon one, so almost nobody > >> will notice whether this is fixed or not. > > > > Clearly this seems to be another example of a 1.2 file without the > > initial > > Standard layout. > > It is a bit different than bug 2088: Here even the "\layout" tag is > missing, in bug 2088 we have at least a "\layout" tag.
After sometime looking for lyx-1.2.x code I don't see how any of those could have been generated inside lyx. > > Either 1.2 really was able to produce such files or people took > > advantage of > > the fact that lyx 1.3 and 1.2 was able to read them. > > > > If the first it is easy to get a fix, if the second should we be nice > > and > > support those files since previous lyx versions supported it? > > In case of bug 2088: yes, but in this case I think it becomes too > complicated: How do we know when the header ends and the document begins if > we can not wait for \layout? Because it is the first time we see a whiteline. Really. :-) > Georg -- José Abílio
