Enrico Forestieri wrote: > Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > could this be bug 2167? If yes, could you get Bo Peng testing your patch? > > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2167 > > Hi Jürgen, > > no, it is not the same. The patch for bug 2167 is buried in the patch you > can find in this thread: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/51140 > In that patch, only the lines containing "ascent" and "descent" are > pertinent to bug 2167, though. I don't think it is necessary to ask Bo, > because I also observed that bug and thereafter it disappeared. > Bug 2167 was due to the fact that when a previewed image had no descent > (descent=0) then the fraction ascent/(ascent+descent) was never evaluated > and its value was assumed to be 0.5.
I see. That patch has not been committed to cvs, no? Could you please add it to the above bugzilla report, so that it will not be lost? > The problem I am referring to here is different. By trial and error I found > that for a given "Screen DPI" and "Zoom %" set in Tools->Preferences, > there exist a magical value for \preview_scale_factor by which all > previewed images line up correctly with the surrounding text. > But, if you change the latex font size in Document->Settings, the dimension > of the previewed images, and thus their alignment, change, whereas the > text surrounding the images is not affected by the change in latex font > size (11pt, 12pt). Yes, I can reproduce that. You should open a separate report for it on bugzilla and add your patch. Regards, Jürgen
