>>>>> "Edjard" == Edjard Mota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Edjard> IMHO there could be two options. First, each Linux distro Edjard> could take care of checking whether the files needed for a Edjard> given application are there or not, and collect where they can Edjard> be found during the mounting of the packages. Second, and Edjard> perhaps the "easiest one" (at least for the distro guys :) ), Edjard> is to divide templates into standard TeX and those by LyX. It depends what you call 'standard'... Those who are in teTeX? In TeXLive? In the LaTeX distribution of some University? Edjard> At least, this would give a clear message, when loading a Edjard> template, which ones will generate output and which ones may Edjard> not. Note first that you have this message right when you load the template. It is not as if you lost two hours writing a document. What we should do is have a better support for template by associating rigourously a template to a class. Since we do know inside LyX which classes are available, it would allow us to show this information at the template level. I am not sure when this is going to happen though. JMarc
