Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: >>>>> "Edjard" == Edjard
Mota writes:
Edjard> IMHO there could be two options. First, each Linux distro
Edjard> could take care of checking whether the files needed for a
Edjard> given application are there or not, and collect where they can
Edjard> be found during the mounting of the packages. Second, and
Edjard> perhaps the "easiest one" (at least for the distro guys :) ),
Edjard> is to divide templates into standard TeX and those by LyX.
JMarc > It depends what you call 'standard'... Those who are in
JMarc > teTeX? In TeXLive? In the LaTeX distribution of some
JMarc > University?
I meant the teTex. But if we have to consider other standards then you're
right, that might be confusing.
Edjard> At least, this would give a clear message, when loading a
Edjard> template, which ones will generate output and which ones may
Edjard> not.
JMarc > Note first that you have this message right when you JMarc > load the
template. It is not as if you lost two hour writing
JMarc > a document.
Yes, but this has been reported as a bug in some Linux distro, which I don't
agree.
JMarc > What we should do is have a better support for template
JMarc > by associating rigourously a template to a class. Since
JMarc > we do know inside LyX which classes are available, it
JMarc > would allow us to show this information at the template JMarc > level.
I am not sure when this is going to happen though.
JMarc
Could you, or someone, give the directions? I feel like coding and would be
more than pleased to help.
br
Edjard
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis: Internet rápida e grátis.
Instale o discador agora!
