On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 10:45:19PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I do not like the pit_type name at all. From what I can see this is > really some kind of offset. So perhaps par_offset_type or just > offset_type or par_offset is better.
I;'d agree everything that has the same lenght as 'pos_type', i.e. three chars before the _type... Moreover, all the variables are called 'pit' and 'pos', so if the type is changed, the names should change, too. Andre'
