Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 10:45:19PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> I do not like the pit_type name at all. From what I can see this is
>> really some kind of offset. So perhaps par_offset_type or just
>> offset_type or par_offset is better.
>
| I;'d agree everything that has the same lenght as 'pos_type', i.e.
| three chars before the _type...
>
| Moreover, all the variables are called 'pit' and 'pos', so if the
| type is changed, the names should change, too.
Sure.
off_type
--
Lgb
