Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 05:14:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 10:45:19PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >> I do not like the pit_type name at all. From what I can see this is
>> >> really some kind of offset. So perhaps par_offset_type or just
>> >> offset_type or par_offset is better.
>> >
>> | I;'d agree everything that has the same lenght as 'pos_type', i.e.
>> | three chars before the _type...
>> >
>> | Moreover, all the variables are called 'pit' and 'pos', so if the
>> | type is changed, the names should change, too.
>>
>> Sure.
>>
>> off_type
>
| Fine with me. My last idea was 'pof_type' for 'paragraph offset', but
| 'off' is not worse.
also off_type is used in the stdlib. (not sure if that is good or bad
:-) )
--
Lgb
