John Spray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| * \file GToc.C
| void GToc::updateType()
| {
| changing_views_ = true;
| string const targettype =
| toc::getType(controller().params().getCmdName());
>
| typestore_->clear();
| vector<string> types = controller().getTypes();
| vector<string>::iterator it = types.begin();
| vector<string>::iterator end = types.end();
| for(;it != end; ++it) {
| Gtk::TreeModel::iterator row = typestore_->append();
| (*row)[listCol_] = *it;
| if (*it == targettype)
| typecombo_->set_active(row);
| }
>
| // Because tiny empty ComboBoxes just look silly
| typecombo_->set_size_request(
| typestore_->children().empty() ? 130 : -1, -1);
or even simpler
...set_size_request(types.empty() ? 130 : -1, -1);
is the (-1, -1) call to set_size_request really needed if you don't
have any items in the list?
if (types.empty())
...set_size_request(130, _1);
perhaps even in front of the loop?
--
Lgb
