Angus Leeming wrote: > It always used to do this and I'm a crusty old bugger who doesn't like > change?
;-) Gotcha > So, no, not really ;-) > > We're not M$ after all, so backwards-compatibility for the sake of > backwards-compatibility shouldn't be the 'be all and end all'. Do it > your way. Much cleaner logically, after all. I also think so, but maybe we should think a bit more about pluses and cons. For instance, what about clicking in button insets? Right now it has the effect of popping the dialog *and* setting the cursor after it. What's the logic? Is there an useability advantage of behaving like that? Alfredo
