On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 04:48:25PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > Given range style LCS > > > > > > aaasa dfas dfa ds fasd va sdcv asdv casd > > > > > > |----- a ------| > > > | > > > |----- b -----| > > > > > > what should be output to LaTeX/XML/whatever? > > > > That was always my question. > > And that's _the_ argument against 'styles as ranges'.
That's it ? Doesn't seem a very strong argument to me. "Because a user may for some reason try to apply overlapping non-recursive styles, and there might be some corner cases where interpretation is ambiguous (what are they ?), we should introduce a troublesome non-standard UI to force them into the implementation model." Did I paraphrase you wrongly ? regards john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
