Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 11:29:08AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | The trouble as I see it is that the real problems in the 1.4.x tree stem
>> | from the kernel being in a state of transition from old design to new. My
>> | reading of discussions from those who know is that fixing some (major)
>> | bugs _requires_ this transition to be pushed on.
>>
>> I do not belive this. What I think is the case is that those in
>> "charge" of the transition are unwilling
>
| 'unwilling' is too strong a word I suppose.
Perhaps.
>> to work on making a intermediate state stable.
>>
>> (anyhow I see noone moving the transition forward...)
>
| I've put out a 'small steps' plan where the steps are of a size where
| everyone can contribute.
This was for a unified cursor only, right?
--
Lgb
