Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The trouble as I see it is that the real problems in the 1.4.x tree stem
| from the kernel being in a state of transition from old design to new. My
| reading of discussions from those who know is that fixing some (major)
| bugs _requires_ this transition to be pushed on.
I do not belive this. What I think is the case is that those in
"charge" of the transition are unwilling to work on making a
intermediate state stable.
(anyhow I see noone moving the transition forward...)
| A serious alternative might be to push the head of the cvs tree to 1.5 and
| to backport stable features to a 1.4 tree based on 1.3.x. John has already
| suggested something similar.
I'd like to avoid this.
--
Lgb
