On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 12:44:22PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 11:02:42AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:56:42AM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > > > As said before (on the wrong list) there's no performance difference with > > > current cvs (because a bug in there). But a current full rebreak on buffer > > > switching is almost unnoticeable on today's hardware and acceptable on old > > > one IMHO. > > > > As expected... > > What's expected ?
That Alfredo's patch does not change current behaviour. > Waiting two seconds to switch between moderately sized > documents ? BTW: Are you really keeping different 'buffers of moderate size' within a single LyX instance? And change the active buffer frequently? If so, your usage pattern is completely different from mine. Andre'
