Andre Poenitz wrote: > As the second buffer is already broken into rows, there is not really a > need for a rebreak on buffer change, is there?
I've though about this. It would work now, but will break down when we have multiple bvs for the same buffer. (don't know if it worth considering, though) > Apart from that: If speed up is necessary it should be done by > introducing the notion of a 'touched' paragraph and rebreaking only > those. Doesn't solve the multiple bv's for one buffer problem... Alfredo
