On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 04:42:13PM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote: > I take it that conversion to/from a QString would be trivial were we to use > a 16bit type internally (given your assertion that QString is a UTF-16 data > buffer) but that we would need something more complex if we stored the data > using a 32bit type?
Yes. libiconv is probably the sensible choice here. regards john