Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 02:44:08PM +0100, John Levon wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 03:35:13PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: >> >> > So all the math symbols are already there in Qt and we would not need >> > the tex fonts? >> >> Math symbols are a different matter. But that has nothing to do with >> unicode changes as far as I can see... > > No, but I thought we could get rid of one of the biggest font-related > problems as soon as we switch to unicode. > >> I'm not even sure unicode has all the glyphs we need with assigned >> codepoints ... > > Probably more than X symbol anyway...
Now I know that this exposes my ignorance but nonetheless... 'switching to unicode' means reading in, writing out and storing a LyX buffer as a wstring rather than a string, right? This wstring can then be handed over to Qt and it will 'do the right thing'? None of that toqstr, fromqstr stuff? I guess therefore that we will need converters from wchar_t to/from c-strings for xforms then. Am I on the right track? -- Angus
