On wtorek 01 kwiecień 2003 09:29 am, Angus Leeming wrote: > Kuba Ober wrote: > > I guess that for all practical matters it's all about whether one wants > > to refer to member variables as > > > > m_emergencyExit // m_ prepended > > > > or as > > > > this->emergencyExit > > > > I guess getting rid of m_blah pollution (in case of my own code, at > > least) from the class declaration might be useful. But then this-> vs m_ > > is four more keystrokes. Might not make any real-life difference, though.
> Not onyl best practice, but mandatory. I post here again, because I was > too fast and I stated that 14.6.2 paragraph 4 applies here (making that > this-> needed) but in fact it is paragraph 3: Oh, okay, per standard this is mandatory when template-parametrized base class is used. So, for other uses, we can still do whatever we used to ;-) Cheers, Kuba Ober
