On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 11:27:29AM +0000, Jos?  Matos wrote:

> On Friday 14 March 2003 11:16, John Levon wrote:
> >
> > Plus the duplication of the changelong in the commit - most commit
> > messages are good enough just being the changelog
> 
>   I remember to have seen some experiments from Lars where the Changelog diff 
> was expanded in cvslog. If that was done then the commit message could only 
> be the title for the whole changes.

Sometimes though it's useful to add notes (please test etc.). So we
could make it always add the ChangeLog diffs but also pick something up
from the commitlog...

john

Reply via email to