On Friday 14 March 2003 11:16, John Levon wrote: > > Plus the duplication of the changelong in the commit - most commit > messages are good enough just being the changelog
I remember to have seen some experiments from Lars where the Changelog diff was expanded in cvslog. If that was done then the commit message could only be the title for the whole changes. The cvs log is just an example of browsing the changes, any other method will not differ significantly from it. > john -- José Abílio
