On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:47:34PM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote: > Ahhhh. I remember now. The bulk of the work is actually done in the _static_ > methods params2string and string2params. If I did as you suggest, then I'd > have to create a temporary MailInset just to extract the name.
The name function could be static as well, couldn't it? [I don't like static class function too much, either...] > Or hard code it of course. Do you have any preferences over leaving > this name stuff as-is or having string literals in 3 places? Leave it as it is, we could have a look again later. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
