Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:32:46PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | > Uh, no. But returning by value should do no harm. | > | | > | I agree that it would simplify things. Would you return a string or a | > | char const* ? | > | > A string. | > | > A const string even... | | I knew it.
One reason:
inset1->name() == inset2->name()
Would that work with char const *?
--
Lgb
